Assessment Step 4

Much better!

We must say the Individual Models for our site were obviously much more interesting, suggestive and creative than the re-programming proposals. To some extent perhaps we should say that this enormous difference is understandable: We, architects, deal with form. So might be we feel more confortable when we just work with our specific field of responsability. On the other hand, we produce more simplistic statements when we have to develop arguments related to other disciplines or activities. 

Anyway, congratulations to the whole Unit, in first place.

We had 27 models presented. It isn't difficult to recognise a series of different morphological families among them. But it can be stated that we have 6-8 very good ideas to develop our Unit Project for the site.

Here you have our brief assessment of your models, regarding both, concept and execution:

- 5 _ excelent. Excelent work in progress. Strong approaches and clean and accurate execution of your models.

( David, M.José R., Bárbara, J.Antonio, Enrique and Arian)

- 7 _ very good work. Well done. Sometimes your approach is simple better developped by some other student; or the execution of the model is not as precise as it should be. But they are very good work.

( Sergio F., Laura R., Daniela, Dimitra, Antolín, Luis and Sergio L.)

- 7 _ Enough, but we feel you could have done better both in conception and execution. Many of them are good ideas that may very well be selected for futher development, but you should have made things easier for the rest of the Unit making a better model of your ideas. 

(Carlos, Rafael, Ínigo, Francisco, Laura A., Cristina, Miguel)

- 8 _ Your models are insufficiently developped due to either a too quick execution or an improper series of arguments and decisions regarding sites' morphological conditions and your expressed intentions. We know some of you have had different problems, but, anyway, you could have done much better. We advise you to have a look at the rest of the models done within the Unit.

(Andrés, M.José G., Lavinia, Michele, Panagiotis, Aikaterini, Arturo, Martha)

- 5 _ Non presented. Nothing to say about them.

That's it. I repeat my congratulations to the whole Unit as a team (even those who haven't achieved a better individual result), because the everyones' participation has been important. Now we have to continue. 

See you on Thursday 4 April to make our final initial decisions to complete our projects for the site.